![]() |
| tltgroup.org |
As previously discussed, I believe we are at the dawn of a revolution in education. The example from Stanford is just the tip of the iceberg. The Khan Academy is another example that is more established.
![]() |
| tltgroup.org |
![]() |
| KaplanInternational.com |
For a long time now, universities have flourished by offering a bundled package of knowledge and credentialing. People attended university in order to learn stuff that they couldn't learn elsewhere -- because the experts weren't elsewhere -- and to be certified by those experts as having actually learned said stuff. The bundle has been a culturally powerful one.
![]() |
| NY Times |
- Broaden the base and lower the rates
- Tax consumption
- Tax bads rather than goods
- Keep it simple
Dr. [Danah] Boyd — a senior researcher at Microsoft, an assistant professor at New York University and a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard
“The single most important thing about Danah is that she’s the first anthropologist we’ve got who comes from the tribe she’s studying,”
The alums fingered a complicated tax code, an inefficient political system, a struggling K-12 education system, and persistent pressure from abroad as reasons why the U.S. will become less competitive over the next three years–something 71 percent think will happen.
Of Alexander, gods and bathrooms
To Develop Expertise, Motivation is Necessary but Insufficient
Sorry, Strivers: Talent Matters
“overwhelming” evidence that lectures are an ineffective way for universities to achieve the educational objectives they set.
of the Top 0.1% earners of the polulation:
- 18 percent are financial professionals.
- 42 percent are executives, managers, or supervisors in nonfinancial businesses. More than half of those are in closely-held (presumably often small) businesses.
- 7 percent are lawyers.
- 6 percent are in medicine.
- 3 percent are in arts, media, or sports.
- Less than 1 percent are professors or scientists. :(
"In my classroom, students lose 1/4 point for wrong answers on quizzes. But for writing “I don’t know,” they get 1/4 point. (A correct answer is 1 point). The rationale is that if someone is in a medical emergency, and someone asks me what should be done, the answer “I don’t know” is much preferable to a guess. “I don’t know” leads the questioner to ask someone who hopefully is knowledgeable.
Part of why “I don’t know is so hard to say” stems from an education system based on attempting every single question, whether you know the answer or not.
P.S.: End-of-year student survey showed students strongly supported the +1/4 point IDK and -1/4 point wrong-answer system."